Lava Virat Curve 5G vs Poco F7 Pro
The Lava Virat Curve 5G (2026) runs on the Dimensity 7100, while the Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Pro leads — 67/100 vs 52/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (2,301,212 vs 785,352).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Virat Curve 5G
Poco F7 Pro
What makes Lava Virat Curve 5G better?
- Overall rating 52/100
What makes Poco F7 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2301212 vs 785352
- Better Geekbench Single: 2203 vs 995
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6511 vs 2925
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Higher performance (82/100 vs 54/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (65/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Virat Curve 5G vs the Poco F7 Pro, the Poco F7 Pro scores 15 points higher (67/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (82/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Virat Curve 5G (82/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (65/100 vs 56/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Virat Curve 5G | Poco F7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 785352 | 2301212 | |
| Geekbench Single | 995 | 2203 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2925 | 6511 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1100 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | — | 206 g | |
| Launch price | — | $499 |
Camera comparison
Lava Virat Curve 5G
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Poco F7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Lava Virat Curve 5G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Virat Curve 5G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Poco F7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Virat Curve 5G and Poco F7 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F7 Pro leads Lava Virat Curve 5G by 65.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Lava Virat Curve 5G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Virat Curve 5G (82/100 vs 54/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (65/100 vs 56/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Virat Curve 5G or the Poco F7 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro is noticeably better than the Lava Virat Curve 5G — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Lava Virat Curve 5G and the Poco F7 Pro?
The Lava Virat Curve 5G has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Poco F7 Pro — 67/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Virat Curve 5G or the Poco F7 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro leads on camera score (37/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Virat Curve 5G or the Poco F7 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro leads on performance (82/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Lava Virat Curve 5G over the Poco F7 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users.