Motorola Signature vs Sharp Aquos R11
The Motorola Signature (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Sharp Aquos R11 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Signature leads — 86/100 vs 74/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Signature has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5100); the Motorola Signature is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 2,314,417); the Motorola Signature is thinner (7.0mm vs 8.9mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Signature
Sharp Aquos R11
What makes Motorola Signature better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 2314417
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 2072
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 6649
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 36W
- Lighter: 186g vs 195g
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 81/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 49/100)
- Better portability (78/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Sharp Aquos R11 better?
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 120Hz
- Better display (90/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Signature vs the Sharp Aquos R11, the Motorola Signature scores 12 points higher (86/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature leads (91/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature leads (77/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (90/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (91/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (77/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (78/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Signature | Sharp Aquos R11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 2314417 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 2072 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 6649 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 36W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 38 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×76.4×7.0 mm | 156.0×74.0×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 195 g | |
| Launch price | $699 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Signature
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Sharp Aquos R11
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 38MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Signature
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Sharp Aquos R11
- 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Signature
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Sharp Aquos R11
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 36W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Signature and Sharp Aquos R11, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Signature leads Sharp Aquos R11 by 32.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Sharp Aquos R11
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (90/100 vs 81/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (91/100 vs 76/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (77/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (78/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Signature or the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Motorola Signature is noticeably better than the Sharp Aquos R11 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Signature and the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Motorola Signature has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Sharp Aquos R11 — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Signature or the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Motorola Signature leads on camera score (91/100 vs 76/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Signature or the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Motorola Signature leads on performance (90/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Signature over the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Motorola Signature is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Sharp Aquos R11 is a better fit for gamers and power users.