Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 64/100 vs 37/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (73/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 50/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 58/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 6/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 27 points higher (64/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (73/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (54/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (55/100 vs 6/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (73/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (54/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (55/100 vs 6/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | — | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | — | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | — | |
| Price | $1499 | — |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (73/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (81/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (54/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (55/100 vs 6/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim by 27 points (64/100 vs 37/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 58/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (73/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.