Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo Y500 (China)
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Vivo Y500 (China) (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300; launch prices were $1799 and $185. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 55/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y500 (China) has the bigger battery (8200 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 879,714); the Vivo Y500 (China) is noticeably lighter (213g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Vivo Y500 (China)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 2813
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 49/100)
What makes Vivo Y500 (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 8200 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Lighter: 213g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $185 vs $1799
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Vivo Y500 (China), the Motorola Razr Fold scores 28 points higher (83/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 30/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Vivo Y500 (China) — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 (China) (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo Y500 (China) are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 (China) (91/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500 (China) is a bit better (74/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo Y500 (China) are nearly equal (52/100 vs 49/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo Y500 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 879714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 2813 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8200 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | — | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 163.1×75.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 213 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $185 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y500 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y500 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo Y500 (China)
- 8200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Vivo Y500 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Vivo Y500 (China) by 247.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1614. Vivo Y500 (China) was $1614 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 (China) (90/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo Y500 (China) are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 (China) (91/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500 (China) is a bit better (74/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo Y500 (China) are nearly equal (52/100 vs 49/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo Y500 (China)?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 (China) by 28 points (83/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo Y500 (China)?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo Y500 (China) — 55/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo Y500 (China)?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo Y500 (China)?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Vivo Y500 (China)?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.