Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo V40 Lite
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Vivo V40 Lite (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 84/100 vs 54/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo V40 Lite has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,068,952 vs 736,675); the Vivo V40 Lite is noticeably lighter (179g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Vivo V40 Lite
- Higher AnTuTu: 3068952 vs 736675
- Better Geekbench Single: 2903 vs 935
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9602 vs 2719
- Faster charging: 80W vs 44W
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 54/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)
- Bigger battery: 5500 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 179g vs 285g
- Better portability (75/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Vivo V40 Lite, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 30 points higher (84/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (71/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo V40 Lite (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo V40 Lite are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo V40 Lite (91/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Vivo V40 Lite (71/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo V40 Lite notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (75/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo V40 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3068952 | 736675 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2903 | 935 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9602 | 2719 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 164.4×74.8×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | — |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo V40 Lite
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo V40 Lite
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo V40 Lite
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Vivo V40 Lite, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Vivo V40 Lite by 316.6% in our overall performance rating.
Vivo V40 Lite
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo V40 Lite (91/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo V40 Lite are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo V40 Lite (91/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Vivo V40 Lite (71/100 vs 54/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo V40 Lite notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (75/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo V40 Lite?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo V40 Lite by 30 points (84/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo V40 Lite?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Vivo V40 Lite — 54/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo V40 Lite?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo V40 Lite?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (91/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Vivo V40 Lite?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo V40 Lite is a better fit for everyday use.