Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo V40 Lite
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Vivo V40 Lite (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 54/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo V40 Lite has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 737,054); the Vivo V40 Lite is noticeably lighter (179g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Vivo V40 Lite
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 737054
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 930
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 2700
- Faster charging: 68W vs 44W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 54/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Vivo V40 Lite better?
- Bigger battery: 5500 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 179g vs 285g
- Better portability (75/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Vivo V40 Lite, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 29 points higher (83/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo V40 Lite (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo V40 Lite are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo V40 Lite (91/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo V40 Lite notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (75/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo V40 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 737054 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 930 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 2700 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5500 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 164.4×74.8×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo V40 Lite
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo V40 Lite
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo V40 Lite
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Vivo V40 Lite, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Vivo V40 Lite by 314.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo V40 Lite
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo V40 Lite (90/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo V40 Lite are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo V40 Lite (91/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo V40 Lite notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (75/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo V40 Lite?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo V40 Lite by 29 points (83/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo V40 Lite?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo V40 Lite — 54/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo V40 Lite?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo V40 Lite?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Vivo V40 Lite?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.