Motorola Razr Fold vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 64/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 910,112); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 138); the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is noticeably lighter (179g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 910112
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 2813
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 71/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 53/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 179g vs 285g
- Better display (89/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Tecno Camon 40 Pro, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 19 points higher (83/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (68/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (79/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Tecno Camon 40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 910112 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 2813 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1080x2436 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 138 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 164.3×74.6×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Tecno Camon 40 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Tecno Camon 40 Pro by 235.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (90/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (91/100 vs 71/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (68/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (79/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 40 Pro — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 71/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.