Motorola Razr Fold vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 86/100 vs 64/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 902,765); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 138); the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is noticeably lighter (179g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 902765
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2813
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 71/100)
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 53/100)
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 179g vs 285g
- Better display (89/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Tecno Camon 40 Pro, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 22 points higher (86/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (71/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (71/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (79/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Tecno Camon 40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 902765 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 2813 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1080x2436 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 138 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 164.3×74.6×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | — |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Tecno Camon 40 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Tecno Camon 40 Pro by 336.8% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (98/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (91/100 vs 71/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (71/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (79/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro by 22 points (86/100 vs 64/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 71/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (98/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.