Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 64/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 902,765); the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is noticeably lighter (179g vs 199g).

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 40 Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Performance 93
Display 95
Camera 60
Battery 64
Portability 68
Value for money 62
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
Performance 55
Display 89
Camera 71
Battery 53
Portability 79
Value for money
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 902765
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1011
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2813
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 55/100)
  • Longer battery life (64/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 89/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Pro better?
  • Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
  • Lighter: 179g vs 199g

  • Better camera (71/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better portability (79/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Tecno Camon 40 Pro, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 14 points higher (78/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro leads (71/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (71/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (79/100 vs 68/100).

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026: The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Tecno Camon 40 Pro: The Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Tecno Camon 40 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 7300
AnTuTu 3379591 902765
Geekbench Single 3041 1011
Geekbench Multi 9494 2813
Display 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2992 1080x2436
Refresh rate 165 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5200 mAh
Charging 68W 45W
Wireless charging 30W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 138
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Front camera 50 MP 50 MP
RAM 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 512GB 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 15
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 164.3×74.6×7.3 mm
Weight 199 g 179 g
Launch price $1499
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 50MP
71
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
  • 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
95
display
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2436
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
64
battery
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Tecno Camon 40 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
78/100
3379591 AnTuTu
Tecno Camon 40 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300
64/100 -274.4%
902765 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Tecno Camon 40 Pro by 274.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
$1499
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (93/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (71/100 vs 60/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (79/100 vs 68/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 40 Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro — 64/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?

The Tecno Camon 40 Pro leads on camera score (71/100 vs 60/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (93/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.