Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 64/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 910,112); the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is noticeably lighter (179g vs 199g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 910112
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2813
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 55/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 89/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 4700 mAh
- Lighter: 179g vs 199g
- Better camera (71/100 vs 57/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Tecno Camon 40 Pro, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 12 points higher (76/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro leads (71/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (71/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (79/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Tecno Camon 40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 910112 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 2813 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1080x2436 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 138 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.3×74.6×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Tecno Camon 40 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 40 Pro by 225.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (91/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (71/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (79/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 40 Pro — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro leads on camera score (71/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.