Motorola Razr Fold vs OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; launch prices were $1799 and $661. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 83/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 3,032,039); the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (205g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 3032039
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 2725
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 8932
- Overall rating 83/100
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 205g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $661 vs $1799
- Better camera (94/100 vs 91/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China), the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 4 points higher (87/100 vs 83/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (83/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 90/100. In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (83/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 3032039 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 2725 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 8932 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 2772x1272 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 205 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $661 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and OPPO Reno16 Pro (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) by 0.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1138. OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) was $1138 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 90/100.
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (83/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) edges out the Motorola Razr Fold by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 87/100.
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.