Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 76/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is faster in AnTuTu (3,126,402 vs 3,032,039).

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025

Performance 91
Display 94
Camera 60
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money —

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

Performance 90
Display 84
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 59
Value for money 88

What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3126402 vs 3032039
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2725
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 8932
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 205g

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 90/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 59/100)

What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?

  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W

  • Better camera (94/100 vs 60/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 58/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China), the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 11 points higher (87/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (83/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (94/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (83/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a bit better (68/100 vs 59/100).

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025: The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China): The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
AnTuTu 3126402 3032039
Geekbench Single 3013 2725
Geekbench Multi 9287 8932
Display 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2912 2772x1272
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 68W 80W
Wireless charging 30W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 50 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 3600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm
Weight 199 g 205 g
Launch price — $661

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025

  • 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1272
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 and OPPO Reno16 Pro (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100
3126402 AnTuTu
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
87/100 -3.1%
3032039 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 leads OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) by 3.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025

Price unknown

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

$661

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (94/100 vs 60/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (83/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a bit better (68/100 vs 59/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 or the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 or the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 over the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.