Motorola Razr 70 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Motorola Razr 70 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $699 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 60/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 953,150); the Motorola Razr 70 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr 70 better?
- Lighter: 188g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $699 vs $899
- Better portability (74/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 953150
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3185
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 57/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 28 points higher (88/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 49/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 70 — 34/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (94/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Razr 70 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (81/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (74/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7400X | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 953150 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3185 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2640x1080 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.3×74.0×7.3 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $699 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2640x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 70 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Razr 70 by 71.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $200. Motorola Razr 70 was $200 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (94/100 vs 57/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Razr 70 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (96/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (81/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (74/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 by 28 points (88/100 vs 60/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 70 has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.