Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S23

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy S23 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; launch prices were $1099 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 77/100 vs 66/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3900); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,126,402 vs 1,656,761); the Samsung Galaxy S23 is noticeably lighter (168g vs 199g).

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S23 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

Performance 91
Display 95
Camera 60
Battery 61
Portability 68
Value for money 64

Samsung Galaxy S23

Performance 75
Display 82
Camera 67
Battery 29
Portability 83
Value for money 46

What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3126402 vs 1656761
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3900 mAh
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 75/100)
  • Longer battery life (61/100 vs 29/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 82/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S23 better?

  • Lighter: 168g vs 199g
  • Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $1099

  • Better camera (67/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better portability (83/100 vs 68/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S23, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 11 points higher (77/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 29/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 70 Ultra — 64/100, Samsung Galaxy S23 — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (95/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 is a bit better (67/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 (61/100 vs 29/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (83/100 vs 68/100).

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Samsung Galaxy S23: The Samsung Galaxy S23 is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S23
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 3126402 1656761
Geekbench Single 3013 2004
Geekbench Multi 9287 5311
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.1" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2992 2340x1080
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 3900 mAh
Charging 68W 25W
Wireless charging 15W 15W
DXOMark (camera) — 133
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 50 MP 12 MP
RAM 16GB 8GB
Storage 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 13
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 1750 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 157.8×76.2×7.6 mm
Weight 199 g 168 g
Launch price $1099 $799

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera

Samsung Galaxy S23

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
67
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
95
display

Samsung Galaxy S23

  • 6.1" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
61
battery

Samsung Galaxy S23

  • 3900 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
29
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S23, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
77/100
3126402 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
66/100 -88.7%
1656761 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S23 by 88.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

$1099

Samsung Galaxy S23

$799

Launch price difference: $300. Samsung Galaxy S23 was $300 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 (91/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (95/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 is a bit better (67/100 vs 60/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 (61/100 vs 29/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (83/100 vs 68/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S23?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S23 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S23?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Samsung Galaxy S23 — 66/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S23?

The Samsung Galaxy S23 leads on camera score (67/100 vs 60/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S23?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S23?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S23 is a better fit for active users.