Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; launch prices were $1099 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 80/100 vs 64/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,436,963).

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Performance 98
Display 95
Camera 60
Battery 61
Portability 68
Value for money 72
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Performance 70
Display 80
Camera 63
Battery 42
Portability 51
Value for money 40
What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1436963
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1675
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4453
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 209g

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (61/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 51/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S23 FE better?
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $1099

  • Better camera (63/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 16 points higher (80/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (98/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 70 Ultra — 72/100, Samsung Galaxy S23 FE — 40/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (98/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (95/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (63/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (61/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (68/100 vs 51/100).

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE: The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 3942923 1436963
Geekbench Single 3640 1675
Geekbench Multi 11033 4453
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.4" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1224x2992 2340x1080
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
Charging 68W 25W
Wireless charging 15W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 127
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 8 MP
Front camera 50 MP 10 MP
RAM 16GB 8GB
Storage 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 13
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 1450 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 158.0×76.5×8.2 mm
Weight 199 g 209 g
Launch price $1099 $599
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 10MP
63
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
95
display
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
  • 6.4" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
61
battery
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
42
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
80/100
3942923 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
64/100 -174.4%
1436963 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S23 FE by 174.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
$1099
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
$599

Launch price difference: $500. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE was $500 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (98/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (95/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (63/100 vs 60/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (61/100 vs 42/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (68/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE — 64/100.

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (98/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE is a better fit for active users.