Motorola Razr 60 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Motorola Razr 60 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $700 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 54/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 886,677); the Motorola Razr 60 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 226g).
Motorola Razr 60
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 188g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $700 vs $899
- Better portability (72/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 886677
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 3185
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 5W
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 56/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 42/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 41/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 20/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 33 points higher (87/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 41/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (93/100 vs 56/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Razr 60 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (81/100 vs 41/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (72/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (86/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7400X | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 886677 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3185 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.9" LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2640x1080 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1700 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $700 | $899 |
Motorola Razr 60
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 60
- 6.9" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2640x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr 60 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Razr 60 by 72.9% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $199. Motorola Razr 60 was $199 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (93/100 vs 56/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Razr 60 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (96/100 vs 42/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (81/100 vs 41/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (72/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (86/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 by 33 points (87/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 42/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 56/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.