Motorola Razr 60 vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Motorola Razr 60 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $700 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 54/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4500); the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,740,528 vs 886,677); the Motorola Razr 60 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 215g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 by 32 points (86/100 vs 54/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60
Performance 56
Display 81
Camera 42
Battery 41
Portability 72
Value for money 20
Vivo iQOO 15
Performance 94
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 84
What makes Motorola Razr 60 better?
  • Lighter: 188g vs 215g

  • Better portability (72/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3740528 vs 886677
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1061
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3185
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 5W
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $700

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 42/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 41/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better value for money (84/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 32 points higher (86/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (94/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 41/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (84/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (94/100 vs 56/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (78/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (85/100 vs 41/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (72/100 vs 48/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (84/100 vs 20/100).

Motorola Razr 60: The Motorola Razr 60 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 60 Vivo iQOO 15
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7400X Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 886677 3740528
Geekbench Single 1061 3041
Geekbench Multi 3185 9494
Display 6.9" LTPO OLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2640x1080 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 30W 100W
Wireless charging 5W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1700 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8 IP68
Dimensions 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 188 g 215 g
Launch price $700 $599
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
42
camera
Vivo iQOO 15
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60
  • 6.9" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2640x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 5W
41
battery
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 60 and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
54/100
886677 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +76.3%
3740528 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Motorola Razr 60 by 76.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 60
$700
Vivo iQOO 15
$599

Launch price difference: $101. Vivo iQOO 15 was $101 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (94/100 vs 56/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (99/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (78/100 vs 42/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (85/100 vs 41/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (72/100 vs 48/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (84/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 by 32 points (86/100 vs 54/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Motorola Razr 60 has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 42/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on performance (94/100 vs 56/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Motorola Razr 60 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.