Motorola Razr 50 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Motorola Razr 50 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 51/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 877,641); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 92); the Motorola Razr 50 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 226g).
Motorola Razr 50
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 188g vs 226g
- Better portability (74/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 36/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 50 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 36 points higher (87/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Razr 50 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 (96/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 (81/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (74/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 50 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 92 | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.3×74.0×7.3 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Motorola Razr 50
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 50
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 50
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr 50 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Razr 50 by 73.2% in our overall performance rating.
Motorola Razr 50
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 (93/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Razr 50 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 (96/100 vs 36/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 (81/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (74/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 50 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 by 36 points (87/100 vs 51/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 50 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 50 has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 50 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 36/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 50 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 50 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 50 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.