Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S26
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads — 75/100 vs 54/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S26 has the bigger battery (4000 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,126 vs 1,420,808); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 184g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S26
What makes Motorola Razr 40 Ultra better?
- Faster charging: 30W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Better display (91/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3161126 vs 1420808
- Better Geekbench Single: 2880 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9100 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 4000 vs 3800 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Faster wireless charging: 15W vs 5W
- Lighter: 162g vs 184g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (77/100 vs 23/100)
- Longer battery life (31/100 vs 26/100)
- Better portability (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S26, the Samsung Galaxy S26 scores 21 points higher (75/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (77/100 vs 23/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (77/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a bit better (31/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Samsung Exynos 2600 | |
| AnTuTu | 1420808 | 3161126 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 2880 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 9100 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2340x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3800 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 146 | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 162 g | |
| Launch price | — | $799 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- Main: 12MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S26
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 3800 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S26, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 leads Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 55.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (91/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (77/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a bit better (31/100 vs 26/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 21 points (75/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on camera score (77/100 vs 23/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on performance (91/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users.