Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S25+
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Samsung Galaxy S25+ (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads — 71/100 vs 54/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S25+ has the bigger battery (4900 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25+ is faster in AnTuTu (3,219,688 vs 1,420,808).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25+
What makes Motorola Razr 40 Ultra better?
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 184g vs 190g
- Better display (91/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (80/100 vs 72/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25+ better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3219688 vs 1420808
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9700 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 4900 vs 3800 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Faster wireless charging: 15W vs 5W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (40/100 vs 23/100)
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 26/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S25+, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ scores 17 points higher (71/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads (92/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads (40/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads (54/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (92/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25+ are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (40/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (54/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (80/100 vs 72/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1420808 | 3219688 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 9700 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3800 mAh | 4900 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- Main: 12MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 3800 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- 4900 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S25+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 55.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (92/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25+ are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (40/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (54/100 vs 26/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (80/100 vs 72/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Samsung Galaxy S25+ is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads on camera score (40/100 vs 23/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads on performance (92/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy S25+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.