Motorola Moto G77 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Motorola Moto G77 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $269 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 55/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 550,018); the Motorola Moto G77 is noticeably lighter (182g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G77 by 36 points (91/100 vs 55/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G77
Performance 44
Display 84
Camera 49
Battery 59
Portability 77
Value for money 60
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Motorola Moto G77 better?
  • Lighter: 182g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $269 vs $950

  • Better portability (77/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 550018
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 803
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2047
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 49/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 59/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G77 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 36 points higher (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 59/100). Value score: Motorola Moto G77 — 60/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G77 (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G77 (96/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G77 (85/100 vs 59/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G77 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (77/100 vs 39/100).

Motorola Moto G77: The Motorola Moto G77 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Moto G77 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 6400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 550018 4247433
Geekbench Single 803 3640
Geekbench Multi 2047 11033
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1272x2772 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 30W 100W
Wireless charging 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 108 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP69
Dimensions 164.2×77.4×7.3 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 182 g 230 g
Launch price $269 $950
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G77
  • Main: 108MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
49
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G77
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1272x2772
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G77
  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless charging: no data
59
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G77 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G77 MediaTek Dimensity 6400
55/100
550018 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +87.1%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Moto G77 by 87.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Moto G77
$269
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $681. Motorola Moto G77 was $681 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G77 (99/100 vs 44/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G77 (96/100 vs 49/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G77 (85/100 vs 59/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G77 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (77/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G77 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G77 by 36 points (91/100 vs 55/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G77 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Motorola Moto G77 has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G77 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 49/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G77 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 44/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G77 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Motorola Moto G77 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.