Motorola Moto G64 vs Samsung Galaxy A03s

The Motorola Moto G64 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025, while the Samsung Galaxy A03s (2021) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Moto G64 leads — 32/100 vs 13/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G64 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Moto G64 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03s doesn't.

The Motorola Moto G64 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A03s — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G64
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 31
Battery 48
Design 60
Value for money 55
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 0
Battery 36
Design 55
Value for money 100
What makes Motorola Moto G64 better?
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
  • Lighter: 192g vs 196g

  • Better camera (31/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (48/100 vs 36/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A03s better?

  • Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G64 vs the Samsung Galaxy A03s, the Motorola Moto G64 scores 19 points higher (32/100 vs 13/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G64 leads (31/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 leads (48/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03s leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G64 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G64 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (31/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (48/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (60/100 vs 55/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03s significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (100/100 vs 55/100).

Motorola Moto G64: The Motorola Moto G64 is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy A03s: The Samsung Galaxy A03s is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Moto G64 Samsung Galaxy A03s
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7025 MediaTek Helio P35
AnTuTu 199111
Geekbench Single 476
Geekbench Multi 828
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 6.5" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2400
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 30W
Main camera 50 MP 13 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 0 MP
Front camera 16 MP 5 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 2GB / 3GB / 4GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 32GB
OS Android 14, planned upgrade to Android 15
NFC yes no
Dimensions 161.6×73.8×8.9 mm 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm
Weight 192 g 196 g
Price $130
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G64
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
31
camera
Samsung Galaxy A03s
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
0
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G64
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy A03s
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
0
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G64
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery
Samsung Galaxy A03s
  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
36
battery
Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Moto G64
Price unknown
Samsung Galaxy A03s
$130
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G64 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (100/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G64 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (31/100 vs 0/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (48/100 vs 36/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (60/100 vs 55/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03s significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (100/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Samsung Galaxy A03s?

The Motorola Moto G64 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A03s — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G64 and the Samsung Galaxy A03s?

The Motorola Moto G64 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03s — 13/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Samsung Galaxy A03s?

The Motorola Moto G64 leads on camera score (31/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G64 over the Samsung Galaxy A03s?

The Motorola Moto G64 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy A03s is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.