Motorola Defy 2 vs Samsung Galaxy A03s
The Motorola Defy 2 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930, while the Samsung Galaxy A03s (2021) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Defy 2 leads — 27/100 vs 13/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Defy 2 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03s doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A03s is noticeably lighter (196g vs 268g).
Motorola Defy 2
Samsung Galaxy A03s
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Better camera (28/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 196g vs 268g
- Better design/ergonomics (55/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Motorola Defy 2 vs the Samsung Galaxy A03s, the Motorola Defy 2 scores 14 points higher (27/100 vs 13/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Defy 2 leads (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03s leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Defy 2 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Defy 2 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100. In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03s significantly outperforms the Motorola Defy 2 (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03s significantly outperforms the Motorola Defy 2 (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Motorola Defy 2 | Samsung Galaxy A03s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | MediaTek Helio P35 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 199111 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 476 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 828 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 2GB / 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.0×80.0×11.9 mm | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 268 g | 196 g | |
| Price | — | $130 |
Motorola Defy 2
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A03s
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Motorola Defy 2
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A03s
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Motorola Defy 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A03s
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Motorola Defy 2
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Defy 2 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Defy 2 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (28/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03s significantly outperforms the Motorola Defy 2 (55/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03s significantly outperforms the Motorola Defy 2 (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Defy 2 or the Samsung Galaxy A03s?
The Motorola Defy 2 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A03s — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Defy 2 and the Samsung Galaxy A03s?
The Motorola Defy 2 has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03s — 13/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Defy 2 or the Samsung Galaxy A03s?
The Motorola Defy 2 leads on camera score (28/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Defy 2 over the Samsung Galaxy A03s?
The Motorola Defy 2 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy A03s is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.