Motorola Moto G100S vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Motorola Moto G100S (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $130 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 51/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 829,894); the Motorola Moto G100S is noticeably lighter (210g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G100S by 40 points (91/100 vs 51/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Moto G100S

Performance 55
Display 66
Camera 33
Battery 57
Portability 47
Value for money 82

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Motorola Moto G100S better?

  • Lighter: 210g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $130 vs $950

  • Better portability (47/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 829894
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1009
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2892
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 33/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 66/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G100S vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 40 points higher (91/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 57/100). Value score: Motorola Moto G100S — 82/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G100S (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G100S (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G100S (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G100S (85/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G100S is a bit better (47/100 vs 39/100).

Motorola Moto G100S: The Motorola Moto G100S is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Moto G100S Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 829894 4247433
Geekbench Single 1009 3639
Geekbench Multi 2892 11047
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2400 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 30W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1050 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP69
Dimensions 166.2×76.5×8.6 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 210 g 230 g
Launch price $130 $950

Camera comparison

Motorola Moto G100S

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 8MP
33
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Moto G100S

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Moto G100S

  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • No wireless charging
57
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G100S and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G100S Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
51/100
829894 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +80.5%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Moto G100S by 80.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Moto G100S

$130

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $820. Motorola Moto G100S was $820 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G100S (99/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G100S (89/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G100S (96/100 vs 33/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G100S (85/100 vs 57/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G100S is a bit better (47/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Moto G100S or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G100S by 40 points (91/100 vs 51/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G100S and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Motorola Moto G100S has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G100S or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 33/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G100S or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G100S over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Motorola Moto G100S is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.