Motorola Moto G100S vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Motorola Moto G100S (2025) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 31/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP.
Motorola Moto G100S
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Higher performance (1/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 0/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 28/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 37/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto G100S vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 6 points higher (37/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 28/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G100S leads (52/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Moto G100S and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G100S (81/100 vs 28/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G100S significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (52/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a bit better (50/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Motorola Moto G100S | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 | — | |
| AnTuTu | 809091 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1009 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2892 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1050 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.2×76.5×8.6 mm | — | |
| Weight | 210 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Motorola Moto G100S
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Moto G100S
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Moto G100S
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Moto G100S and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G100S (81/100 vs 28/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G100S significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (52/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a bit better (50/100 vs 37/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G100S or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim edges out the Motorola Moto G100S by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G100S and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Motorola Moto G100S has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G100S or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 28/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G100S over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Motorola Moto G100S is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.