Motorola Edge 50 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Motorola Edge 50 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 63/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,090,709); the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is noticeably lighter (186g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 50 Pro by 28 points (91/100 vs 63/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Performance 59
Display 93
Camera 50
Battery 69
Portability 65
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Motorola Edge 50 Pro better?
  • Faster charging: 125W vs 100W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 186g vs 230g

  • Better display (93/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (65/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1090709
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1131
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2967
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 59/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 50/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 69/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Edge 50 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 28 points higher (91/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 50 Pro (99/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 50 Pro (96/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 50 Pro (85/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (65/100 vs 39/100).

Motorola Edge 50 Pro: The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Edge 50 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1090709 4247433
Geekbench Single 1131 3640
Geekbench Multi 2967 11033
Display 6.7" P-OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1220x2712 3168x1440
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 125W 100W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 200 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 161.2×72.4×8.2 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 186 g 230 g
Launch price $950
Camera comparison
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 50MP
50
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
  • 6.7" P-OLED
  • Resolution: 1220x2712
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
93
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 125W
  • Wireless: 50W
69
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Edge 50 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
63/100
1090709 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +74.3%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Edge 50 Pro by 74.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 50 Pro (99/100 vs 59/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 50 Pro (96/100 vs 50/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 50 Pro (85/100 vs 69/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (65/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Edge 50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 50 Pro by 28 points (91/100 vs 63/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Edge 50 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Edge 50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 50/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Edge 50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 59/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Edge 50 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.