Meizu Note 16 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Meizu Note 16 Pro (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 58/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,258,010 vs 1,040,961); the Meizu Note 16 Pro is noticeably lighter (198g vs 226g).
Meizu Note 16 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 198g vs 226g
- Better display (93/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3258010 vs 1040961
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1162
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 3315
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6200 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Meizu Note 16 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 29 points higher (87/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (93/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro is a bit better (55/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Meizu Note 16 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1040961 | 3258010 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1162 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3315 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6200 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP66/IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×76.2×8.4 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- 6200 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Meizu Note 16 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Meizu Note 16 Pro by 68.0% in our overall performance rating.
Meizu Note 16 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (93/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (96/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (81/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro is a bit better (55/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro by 29 points (87/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the Meizu Note 16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Meizu Note 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Meizu Note 16 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Meizu Note 16 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.