Meizu Note 16 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Meizu Note 16 Pro (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 58/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,041,899); the Meizu Note 16 Pro is noticeably lighter (198g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Meizu Note 16 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Meizu Note 16 Pro better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 198g vs 230g
- Better display (93/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1041899
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1161
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3390
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6200 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Meizu Note 16 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 33 points higher (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (99/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (55/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Meizu Note 16 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1041899 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1161 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3390 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6200 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP66/IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×76.2×8.4 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- 6200 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Meizu Note 16 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Meizu Note 16 Pro by 75.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Meizu Note 16 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (99/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (96/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (85/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (55/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro by 33 points (91/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the Meizu Note 16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Meizu Note 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Meizu Note 16 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Meizu Note 16 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.