Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs ZTE Blade V80 Design
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the ZTE Blade V80 Design (2025) runs on the Unisoc T7280; launch prices were $139 and $130. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 44/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 191g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
ZTE Blade V80 Design
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Faster charging: 33W vs 22W
- Lighter: 174g vs 191g
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 60/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 68/100)
What makes ZTE Blade V80 Design better?
- Cheaper at launch: $130 vs $139
- Better camera (32/100 vs 30/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the ZTE Blade V80 Design, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 6 points higher (50/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, ZTE Blade V80 Design — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V80 Design (79/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Design and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (32/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the ZTE Blade V80 Design are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | ZTE Blade V80 Design | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Unisoc T7280 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 900x1940 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 22W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 166.0×79.0×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 191 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $130 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Blade V80 Design
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade V80 Design
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 900x1940
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V80 Design
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 22W
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $9. ZTE Blade V80 Design was $9 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V80 Design (79/100 vs 60/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Design and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (32/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the ZTE Blade V80 Design are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the ZTE Blade V80 Design?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 edges out the ZTE Blade V80 Design by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the ZTE Blade V80 Design?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the ZTE Blade V80 Design — 44/100.
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the ZTE Blade V80 Design?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.