Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; launch prices were $139 and $700. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 50/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,757,044 vs 693,978); the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is thinner (7.6mm vs 9.1mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $700
- Better portability (79/100 vs 30/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1757044 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 2004 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 5311 vs 2386
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 33W
- Higher performance (76/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra scores 23 points higher (73/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra leads (76/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra leads (63/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — 60/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (76/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (63/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (79/100 vs 30/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | ZTE Axon 60 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 1757044 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 2004 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 5311 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 163.6×76.0×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | — | |
| Launch price | $139 | $700 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 60.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $561. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $561 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (76/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (78/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (63/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (79/100 vs 30/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 23 points (73/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra leads on performance (76/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a better fit for active users.