Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 50/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is faster in AnTuTu (1,294,871 vs 693,978); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 204g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 204g
- Better portability (79/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1294871 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 1662 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4188 vs 2386
- Faster charging: 80W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (68/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 21 points higher (71/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (68/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (56/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (68/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (79/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 1294871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 1662 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 4188 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | — |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 46.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (68/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (86/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (79/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 21 points (71/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on performance (68/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.