Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 50/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,420,808 vs 693,978); the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 199g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 199g
- Better portability (79/100 vs 50/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 50 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1420808 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 1761 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4688 vs 2386
- Faster charging: 80W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (71/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra scores 23 points higher (73/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra leads (71/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra leads (56/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (71/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a bit better (56/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra (79/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | ZTE Axon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 1420808 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 1761 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 4688 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 161.8×73.1×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | — |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- Main: 64MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and ZTE Axon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 51.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (71/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (86/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a bit better (56/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra (79/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 23 points (73/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra leads on performance (71/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.