Lava Storm Play vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

The Lava Storm Play (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 45/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is faster in AnTuTu (1,294,871 vs 693,978); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Storm Play doesn't.

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play by 26 points (71/100 vs 45/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Storm Play

Performance 51
Display 55
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 59
Value for money 76

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

Performance 68
Display 80
Camera 86
Battery 56
Portability 52
Value for money —

What makes Lava Storm Play better?

  • Lighter: 196g vs 204g

  • Better portability (59/100 vs 52/100)

What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1294871 vs 693978
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1662 vs 1037
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4188 vs 2386
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (68/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (56/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (80/100 vs 55/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Storm Play vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 26 points higher (71/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (68/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (56/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Lava Storm Play (68/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Lava Storm Play (80/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Storm Play is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).

Lava Storm Play: The Lava Storm Play is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Storm Play ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7060 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 693978 1294871
Geekbench Single 1037 1662
Geekbench Multi 2386 4188
Display 6.8" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 720x1600 1116x2480
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 18W 80W
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 64 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 8 MP 16 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 18GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) 750 nits 1500 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 —
Dimensions 168.8×78.1×8.3 mm 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm
Weight 196 g 204 g
Launch price $109 —

Camera comparison

Lava Storm Play

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

  • Main: 64MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
86
camera

Display comparison

Lava Storm Play

  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1116x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Lava Storm Play

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Storm Play and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Storm Play MediaTek Dimensity 7060
45/100
693978 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
71/100 +46.4%
1294871 AnTuTu

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads Lava Storm Play by 46.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Storm Play

$109

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Lava Storm Play (68/100 vs 51/100).

display

In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Lava Storm Play (80/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play (86/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Lava Storm Play is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Storm Play or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play by 26 points (71/100 vs 45/100).

What is the rating of the Lava Storm Play and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Lava Storm Play has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Storm Play or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Storm Play or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on performance (68/100 vs 51/100).

Should you choose the Lava Storm Play over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Lava Storm Play is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.