Honor 500 vs ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
The Honor 500 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 500 leads — 73/100 vs 67/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 500 has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor 500 is faster in AnTuTu (2,344,395 vs 1,754,213); the Honor 500 is thinner (7.8mm vs 9.1mm).
Honor 500
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 2344395 vs 1754213
- Better Geekbench Single: 2070 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6694 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 6000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (82/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (58/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (62/100 vs 30/100)
- Overall rating 67/100
Comparing the Honor 500 vs the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, the Honor 500 scores 6 points higher (73/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor 500 is a bit better (82/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 500 and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 500 and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra are nearly equal (58/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 500 is a bit better (71/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 500 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (62/100 vs 30/100).
| Specification | Honor 500 | ZTE Axon 60 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | 2344395 | 1754213 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2070 | 2004 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6694 | 5311 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2736 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 155.8×74.2×7.8 mm | 163.6×76.0×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | — | |
| Launch price | $380 | — |
Honor 500
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor 500
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2736
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 500
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor 500 and ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor 500 leads ZTE Axon 60 Ultra by 33.6% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Honor 500 is a bit better (82/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 500 and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 500 and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra are nearly equal (58/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 500 is a bit better (71/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 500 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (62/100 vs 30/100).
Which is better: the Honor 500 or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The Honor 500 edges out the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 500 and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The Honor 500 has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — 67/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor 500 or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The Honor 500 leads on performance (82/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Honor 500 over the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The Honor 500 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a better fit for active users.