Lava Agni 3 vs ZTE Blade V80 Design

The Lava Agni 3 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, while the ZTE Blade V80 Design (2025) runs on the Unisoc T7280. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Agni 3 leads — 54/100 vs 44/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Agni 3 has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade V80 Design doesn't; the ZTE Blade V80 Design is noticeably lighter (191g vs 212g).

The Lava Agni 3 is noticeably better than the ZTE Blade V80 Design — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Agni 3

Performance 55
Display 82
Camera 39
Battery 53
Portability 44
Value for money —

ZTE Blade V80 Design

Performance —
Display 60
Camera 32
Battery 43
Portability 68
Value for money 68

What makes Lava Agni 3 better?

  • Faster charging: 66W vs 22W

  • Better camera (39/100 vs 32/100)
  • Longer battery life (53/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (82/100 vs 60/100)

What makes ZTE Blade V80 Design better?

  • Lighter: 191g vs 212g

  • Better portability (68/100 vs 44/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Agni 3 vs the ZTE Blade V80 Design, the Lava Agni 3 scores 10 points higher (54/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Agni 3 leads (53/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Agni 3 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V80 Design (82/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Agni 3 is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Agni 3 is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Design notably outperforms the Lava Agni 3 (68/100 vs 44/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Agni 3 ZTE Blade V80 Design
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7300X Unisoc T7280
AnTuTu 879714 —
Geekbench Single 1011 —
Geekbench Multi 2813 —
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" IPS LCD
Resolution 1200x2652 900x1940
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 66W 22W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 8 MP 0 MP
Front camera 16 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB 8GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits 1000 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP64 —
Dimensions 163.7×75.5×8.8 mm 166.0×79.0×7.7 mm
Weight 212 g 191 g
Launch price — $130

Camera comparison

Lava Agni 3

  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
39
camera

ZTE Blade V80 Design

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 16MP
32
camera

Display comparison

Lava Agni 3

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2652
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

ZTE Blade V80 Design

  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 900x1940
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
60
display

Battery and charging

Lava Agni 3

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 66W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery

ZTE Blade V80 Design

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 22W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Agni 3

Price unknown

ZTE Blade V80 Design

$130

Detailed category analysis

display

In the "display" category, the Lava Agni 3 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V80 Design (82/100 vs 60/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Lava Agni 3 is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Lava Agni 3 is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Design notably outperforms the Lava Agni 3 (68/100 vs 44/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Agni 3 or the ZTE Blade V80 Design?

The Lava Agni 3 is noticeably better than the ZTE Blade V80 Design — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

What is the rating of the Lava Agni 3 and the ZTE Blade V80 Design?

The Lava Agni 3 has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the ZTE Blade V80 Design — 44/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Agni 3 or the ZTE Blade V80 Design?

The Lava Agni 3 leads on camera score (39/100 vs 32/100).

Should you choose the Lava Agni 3 over the ZTE Blade V80 Design?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the ZTE Blade V80 Design (68/100 vs 44/100).