Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads — 58/100 vs 50/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 693,978); the ZTE Axon 40 pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 199g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
ZTE Axon 40 pro
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 199g
- Better portability (79/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 2386
- Faster charging: 65W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (44/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the ZTE Axon 40 pro scores 8 points higher (58/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (61/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (44/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (61/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (44/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (79/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | — |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and ZTE Axon 40 pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 pro leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 31.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Axon 40 pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (61/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (44/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (79/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro edges out the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on camera score (44/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on performance (61/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.