Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Nokia G400

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Nokia G400 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 43/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 477,542); the Nokia G400 has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 198g).

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 edges out the Nokia G400 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

Performance 51
Display 79
Camera 30
Battery 46
Portability 79
Value for money 78

Nokia G400

Performance 41
Display 66
Camera 33
Battery 43
Portability 51
Value for money —

What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 477542
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 746
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 1816
  • Faster charging: 33W vs 20W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Lighter: 174g vs 198g

  • Higher performance (51/100 vs 41/100)
  • Longer battery life (46/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better portability (79/100 vs 51/100)

What makes Nokia G400 better?


  • Better camera (33/100 vs 30/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Nokia G400, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 7 points higher (50/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (51/100 vs 41/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (51/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (79/100 vs 51/100).

Lava Blaze Amoled 2: The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Amoled 2 Nokia G400
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7060 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G
AnTuTu 693978 477542
Geekbench Single 1037 746
Geekbench Multi 2386 1816
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.6" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2400 1080x2408
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 33W 20W
Main camera 50 MP 48 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 5 MP
Front camera 8 MP 16 MP
RAM 6GB 4GB
Storage 128GB 64GB
OS Android 15 Android 12
Brightness (peak) 800 nits —
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 —
Dimensions 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm 166.4×76.7×8.8 mm
Weight 174 g 198 g
Launch price $139 —

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Nokia G400

  • Main: 48MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 16MP
33
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Nokia G400

  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2408
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Nokia G400

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 20W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Nokia G400, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 MediaTek Dimensity 7060
50/100
693978 AnTuTu
Nokia G400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G
43/100 -45.3%
477542 AnTuTu

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Nokia G400 by 45.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

$139

Nokia G400

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (51/100 vs 41/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (79/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Nokia G400?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 edges out the Nokia G400 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Nokia G400?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Nokia G400 — 43/100.

Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Nokia G400?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 41/100).

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Nokia G400?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.