Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Nokia 8
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Nokia 8 (2017) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835; launch prices were $139 and $699. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 29/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3090); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 438,016); the Nokia 8 has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Nokia 8
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 438016
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 427
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 1500
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3090 mAh
- Faster charging: 33W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $699
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 33/100)
- Better camera (30/100 vs 12/100)
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Nokia 8 better?
- Lighter: 160g vs 174g
- Better portability (84/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Nokia 8, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 21 points higher (50/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (51/100 vs 33/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (30/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (46/100 vs 12/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Nokia 8 — 0/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Nokia 8 (51/100 vs 33/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Nokia 8 (79/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Nokia 8 (30/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 (46/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia 8 is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Nokia 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 438016 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 427 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 1500 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 5.3" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2560x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3090 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 7.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 151.5×73.7×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 160 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $699 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Nokia 8
- Main: 13MP f/2.0
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia 8
- 5.3" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2560x1440
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Nokia 8
- 3090 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Nokia 8, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Nokia 8 by 58.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $560. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $560 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Nokia 8 (51/100 vs 33/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Nokia 8 (79/100 vs 52/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Nokia 8 (30/100 vs 12/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 (46/100 vs 12/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia 8 is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Nokia 8?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 by 21 points (50/100 vs 29/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Nokia 8?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Nokia 8 — 29/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Nokia 8?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on camera score (30/100 vs 12/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Nokia 8?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 33/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Nokia 8?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.