Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Nokia 8 V 5G UW

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 45/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 597,974); the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 230g).

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 edges out the Nokia 8 V 5G UW by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

Performance 51
Display 79
Camera 30
Battery 46
Portability 79
Value for money 78

Nokia 8 V 5G UW

Performance 44
Display 63
Camera 47
Battery 33
Portability 30
Value for money —

What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 597974
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 799
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 1836
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 33W vs 18W
  • Lighter: 174g vs 230g

  • Higher performance (51/100 vs 44/100)
  • Longer battery life (46/100 vs 33/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better portability (79/100 vs 30/100)

What makes Nokia 8 V 5G UW better?

  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP

  • Better camera (47/100 vs 30/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 5 points higher (50/100 vs 45/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads (47/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (46/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (51/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (79/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (47/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (46/100 vs 33/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (79/100 vs 30/100).

Lava Blaze Amoled 2: The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Amoled 2 Nokia 8 V 5G UW
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7060 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
AnTuTu 693978 597974
Geekbench Single 1037 799
Geekbench Multi 2386 1836
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.0" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2400 1080x2400
Refresh rate 120 Hz —
Battery 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
Charging 33W 18W
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Front camera 8 MP 24 MP
RAM 6GB 6GB
Storage 128GB 64GB
OS Android 15 Android 10
Brightness (peak) 800 nits —
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 —
Dimensions 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm 171.9×78.6×9.0 mm
Weight 174 g 230 g
Launch price $139 —

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Nokia 8 V 5G UW

  • Main: 64MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 24MP
47
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Nokia 8 V 5G UW

  • 6.0" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: —
63
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Nokia 8 V 5G UW

  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
33
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Nokia 8 V 5G UW, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 MediaTek Dimensity 7060
50/100
693978 AnTuTu
Nokia 8 V 5G UW Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
45/100 -16.1%
597974 AnTuTu

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Nokia 8 V 5G UW by 16.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

$139

Nokia 8 V 5G UW

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (51/100 vs 44/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (79/100 vs 63/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (47/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (46/100 vs 33/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (79/100 vs 30/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Nokia 8 V 5G UW?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 edges out the Nokia 8 V 5G UW by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Nokia 8 V 5G UW?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW — 45/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Nokia 8 V 5G UW?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads on camera score (47/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Nokia 8 V 5G UW?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 44/100).

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Nokia 8 V 5G UW?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.