Infinix Zero 30 4G vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Infinix Zero 30 4G (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 52/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 552,286); the Infinix Zero 30 4G is noticeably lighter (182g vs 309g).
Infinix Zero 30 4G
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 182g vs 309g
- Better display (79/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (71/100 vs 20/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 552286
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2047
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 49/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 48/100)
Comparing the Infinix Zero 30 4G vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 17 points higher (69/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Zero 30 4G (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix Zero 30 4G is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Infinix Zero 30 4G are nearly equal (52/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Infinix Zero 30 4G (63/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix Zero 30 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (71/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Infinix Zero 30 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 552286 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, XOS 13 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 950 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 164.5×75.0×7.9 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 182 g | 309 g | |
| Price | — | $2899 |
Infinix Zero 30 4G
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.7
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Infinix Zero 30 4G
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Infinix Zero 30 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Infinix Zero 30 4G and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Infinix Zero 30 4G by 81.1% in our overall performance rating.
Infinix Zero 30 4G
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Zero 30 4G (91/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix Zero 30 4G is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Infinix Zero 30 4G are nearly equal (52/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Infinix Zero 30 4G (63/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Infinix Zero 30 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (71/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Infinix Zero 30 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Infinix Zero 30 4G — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Infinix Zero 30 4G and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Infinix Zero 30 4G has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which is more powerful: the Infinix Zero 30 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Infinix Zero 30 4G over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Infinix Zero 30 4G is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.