Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 28/100 (a 63-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 16 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 199,111); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) doesn't; the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) is noticeably lighter (195g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) better?
- Lighter: 195g vs 230g
- Better portability (51/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 199111
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 476
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 828
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 16MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 19/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 19/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 57/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 63 points higher (91/100 vs 28/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 19/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 19/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (99/100 vs 19/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (89/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (96/100 vs 19/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (85/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P35 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 199111 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 476 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 828 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10.0 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.5×76.9×9.0 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
- Main: 16MP f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) by 95.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (99/100 vs 19/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (89/100 vs 57/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (96/100 vs 19/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (85/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) by 63 points (91/100 vs 28/100).
What is the rating of the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) has a MobileRank rating of 28/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 19/100).
Which is more powerful: the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 19/100).
Should you choose the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.