Infinix Hot 70 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Infinix Hot 70 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7100, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $235 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 51/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 785,352); the Infinix Hot 70 Pro is noticeably lighter (204g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 70 Pro by 40 points (91/100 vs 51/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Infinix Hot 70 Pro

Performance 54
Display 75
Camera 30
Battery 56
Portability 58
Value for money 56

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Infinix Hot 70 Pro better?

  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 204g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $235 vs $950

  • Better portability (58/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 785352
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 995
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2925
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 75/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Infinix Hot 70 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 40 points higher (91/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Infinix Hot 70 Pro — 56/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 70 Pro (99/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 70 Pro (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix Hot 70 Pro (85/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix Hot 70 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (58/100 vs 39/100).

Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Infinix Hot 70 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 785352 4247433
Geekbench Single 995 3639
Geekbench Multi 2925 11047
Display 6.8" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2344 3168x1440
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 45W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16, up to 3 major Android upgrades, XOS 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 950 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 166.9×79.5×7.9 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 204 g 230 g
Launch price $235 $950

Camera comparison

Infinix Hot 70 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Infinix Hot 70 Pro

  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2344
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
75
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Infinix Hot 70 Pro

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Infinix Hot 70 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Infinix Hot 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7100
51/100
785352 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +81.5%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Infinix Hot 70 Pro by 81.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Infinix Hot 70 Pro

$235

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $715. Infinix Hot 70 Pro was $715 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 70 Pro (99/100 vs 54/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 75/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 70 Pro (96/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix Hot 70 Pro (85/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Infinix Hot 70 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (58/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Infinix Hot 70 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 70 Pro by 40 points (91/100 vs 51/100).

What is the rating of the Infinix Hot 70 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Infinix Hot 70 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Infinix Hot 70 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Infinix Hot 70 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 54/100).

Should you choose the Infinix Hot 70 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.