Infinix Hot 70 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Infinix Hot 70 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7100, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $235 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 52/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,258,010 vs 835,566); the Infinix Hot 70 Pro is noticeably lighter (204g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 70 Pro by 35 points (87/100 vs 52/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Infinix Hot 70 Pro
Performance 55
Display 75
Camera 30
Battery 56
Portability 58
Value for money 60
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Infinix Hot 70 Pro better?
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 204g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $235 vs $899

  • Better portability (58/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3258010 vs 835566
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 995
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2925
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 75/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Infinix Hot 70 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 35 points higher (87/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Infinix Hot 70 Pro — 60/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 70 Pro (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 70 Pro (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Infinix Hot 70 Pro (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix Hot 70 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (58/100 vs 43/100).

Infinix Hot 70 Pro: The Infinix Hot 70 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Infinix Hot 70 Pro Vivo X300 Pro
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7100 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 835566 3258010
Geekbench Single 995 3228
Geekbench Multi 2925 9553
Display 6.8" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2344 1260x2800
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16, up to 3 major Android upgrades, XOS 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 950 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 166.9×79.5×7.9 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 204 g 226 g
Launch price $235 $899
Camera comparison
Infinix Hot 70 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Infinix Hot 70 Pro
  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2344
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
75
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Infinix Hot 70 Pro
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Infinix Hot 70 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Infinix Hot 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7100
52/100
835566 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +74.4%
3258010 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Infinix Hot 70 Pro by 74.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Infinix Hot 70 Pro
$235
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $664. Infinix Hot 70 Pro was $664 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 70 Pro (93/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 75/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 70 Pro (96/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Infinix Hot 70 Pro (81/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Infinix Hot 70 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (58/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Infinix Hot 70 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 70 Pro by 35 points (87/100 vs 52/100).

What is the rating of the Infinix Hot 70 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Infinix Hot 70 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Infinix Hot 70 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Infinix Hot 70 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Infinix Hot 70 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Infinix Hot 70 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.