Honor X60 GT vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor X60 GT (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $250 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 61/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X60 GT has the bigger battery (6300 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,420,808); the Honor X60 GT is noticeably lighter (193g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor X60 GT
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Honor X60 GT better?
- Bigger battery: 6300 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Lighter: 193g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $2899
- Longer battery life (65/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1420808
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 4688
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor X60 GT vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 8 points higher (69/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 32/100). Value score: Honor X60 GT — 72/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor X60 GT (90/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Honor X60 GT is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor X60 GT (52/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X60 GT and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (65/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor X60 GT significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (66/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor X60 GT | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1420808 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1200x2664 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6300 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×74.2×7.7 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 193 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $250 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Honor X60 GT
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor X60 GT
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2664
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor X60 GT
- 6300 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor X60 GT and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Honor X60 GT by 51.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2649. Honor X60 GT was $2649 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor X60 GT (90/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X60 GT is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor X60 GT (52/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X60 GT and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (65/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor X60 GT significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (66/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor X60 GT or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Honor X60 GT by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X60 GT and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor X60 GT has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X60 GT or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor X60 GT or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Honor X60 GT over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor X60 GT is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.