Honor X60 GT vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

The Honor X60 GT (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $250 and $2199. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads — 78/100 vs 61/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X60 GT has the bigger battery (6300 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,453,998 vs 1,420,808); the Honor X60 GT is noticeably lighter (193g vs 215g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor X60 GT — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor X60 GT

Performance 71
Display 83
Camera 32
Battery 65
Portability 66
Value for money 72

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

Performance 96
Display 78
Camera 67
Battery 61
Portability 66
Value for money 64

What makes Honor X60 GT better?

  • Bigger battery: 6300 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 60W
  • Lighter: 193g vs 215g
  • Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $2199

  • Longer battery life (65/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better display (83/100 vs 78/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3453998 vs 1420808
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1761
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4688
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 71/100)
  • Better camera (67/100 vs 32/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor X60 GT vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra scores 17 points higher (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (67/100 vs 32/100). Value score: Honor X60 GT — 72/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 64/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor X60 GT (96/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Honor X60 GT is a bit better (83/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor X60 GT (67/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X60 GT and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (65/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 66/100.

Honor X60 GT: The Honor X60 GT is a better fit for active users.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Honor X60 GT Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1420808 3453998
Geekbench Single 1761 3639
Geekbench Multi 4688 11047
Display 6.7" AMOLED 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1200x2664 1968x2184
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6300 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 80W 60W
Wireless charging 0W 25W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 16 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP65 IP48
Dimensions 161.0×74.2×7.7 mm —
Weight 193 g 215 g
Launch price $250 $2199

Camera comparison

Honor X60 GT

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
32
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
67
camera

Display comparison

Honor X60 GT

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2664
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

  • 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1968x2184
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Battery and charging

Honor X60 GT

  • 6300 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
65
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor X60 GT and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor X60 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
61/100
1420808 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
78/100 +58.9%
3453998 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads Honor X60 GT by 58.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Honor X60 GT

$250

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

$2199

Launch price difference: $1949. Honor X60 GT was $1949 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor X60 GT (96/100 vs 71/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Honor X60 GT is a bit better (83/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor X60 GT (67/100 vs 32/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor X60 GT and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (65/100 vs 61/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 66/100.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor X60 GT or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor X60 GT — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

What is the rating of the Honor X60 GT and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Honor X60 GT has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 78/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor X60 GT or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on camera score (67/100 vs 32/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor X60 GT or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 71/100).

Should you choose the Honor X60 GT over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Honor X60 GT is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.