Honor X40 GT Racing vs Poco M5 (India)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Poco M5 (India) (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 22/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Poco M5 (India) has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Poco M5 (India)
- Faster charging: 66W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 201g
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 48/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Overall rating 22/100
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Poco M5 (India), the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 8 points higher (30/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Poco M5 (India) (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco M5 (India) are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco M5 (India) are nearly equal (51/100 vs 48/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Poco M5 (India) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 408000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 760 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1890 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 12, MIUI 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 164.0×76.1×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 201 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Poco M5 (India)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco M5 (India)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Poco M5 (India)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Poco M5 (India) (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco M5 (India) are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco M5 (India) are nearly equal (51/100 vs 48/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco M5 (India)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the Poco M5 (India) by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco M5 (India)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Poco M5 (India) — 22/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Poco M5 (India)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco M5 (India) is a better fit for everyday use.