Honor X40 GT Racing vs Samsung Galaxy M17e
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Samsung Galaxy M17e (2026) on specs and benchmarks. Both devices score the same overall rating of 30/100. Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M17e has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy M17e doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- Faster charging: 66W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4800 mAh
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 43/100)
The Honor X40 GT Racing and the Samsung Galaxy M17e received the same MobileRank rating — 30/100. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Samsung Galaxy M17e are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17e and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 51/100. In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Samsung Galaxy M17e | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" PLS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 16, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 167.4×77.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- 6.7" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Samsung Galaxy M17e are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17e and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 51/100.
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Samsung Galaxy M17e?
Both devices scored 30/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Samsung Galaxy M17e.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Samsung Galaxy M17e?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17e — 30/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Samsung Galaxy M17e?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy M17e is a better fit for everyday use.