Honor X40 GT Racing vs Poco C71
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Poco C71 (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 26/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C71 has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 32 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco C71 doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Poco C71
- Faster charging: 66W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 32MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 12/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 42/100)
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 193g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (58/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Poco C71, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 4 points higher (30/100 vs 26/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (27/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Poco C71 (27/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco C71 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, the Poco C71 is a bit better (58/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Poco C71 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc T7250 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 310000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 600 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1800 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.9" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1640 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 3GB / 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 15 or Android 15 (Go edition), up to 2 major Android upgrades | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 171.8×77.8×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 193 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Poco C71
- Main: 32MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco C71
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Poco C71
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Poco C71 (27/100 vs 12/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco C71 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Poco C71 is a bit better (58/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco C71?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the Poco C71 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco C71?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Poco C71 — 26/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco C71?
The Honor X40 GT Racing leads on camera score (27/100 vs 12/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Poco C71?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco C71 is a better fit for everyday use.