Honor X40 GT Racing vs ZTE Axon 40
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 leads — 38/100 vs 30/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP.
Honor X40 GT Racing
ZTE Axon 40
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 200g
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 36/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (8/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 27/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the ZTE Axon 40, the ZTE Axon 40 scores 8 points higher (38/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (50/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (50/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the ZTE Axon 40 are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 200 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (50/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the ZTE Axon 40 are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 38/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on camera score (50/100 vs 27/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on performance (8/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the ZTE Axon 40?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for everyday use.