Honor X40 GT Racing vs ZTE Blade V80 Pro
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the ZTE Blade V80 Pro (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro leads — 32/100 vs 30/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade V80 Pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
ZTE Blade V80 Pro
- Faster charging: 66W vs 5W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 36/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 195g vs 199g
- Better camera (38/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (56/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the ZTE Blade V80 Pro, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro scores 2 points higher (32/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro leads (38/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro is a bit better (38/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | ZTE Blade V80 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc T7280 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 900x1940 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 166.0×79.0×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 195 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Blade V80 Pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Blade V80 Pro
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 900x1940
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V80 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro is a bit better (38/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Blade V80 Pro?
The ZTE Blade V80 Pro edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the ZTE Blade V80 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro — 32/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Blade V80 Pro?
The ZTE Blade V80 Pro leads on camera score (38/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the ZTE Blade V80 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade V80 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.