Honor Win2 RT vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Win2 RT (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 81/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win2 RT has the bigger battery (12070 mAh vs 7000); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,950,082).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Win2 RT
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor Win2 RT better?
- Bigger battery: 12070 vs 7000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
- Better display (97/100 vs 89/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3950082
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Lighter: 230g vs 238g
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 98/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 31/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Win2 RT vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 10 points higher (91/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor Win2 RT are nearly equal (99/100 vs 98/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Win2 RT is a bit better (97/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Win2 RT (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 78/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 31/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Win2 RT | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3950082 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.9" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1440x3104 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 185 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 12070 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×78.0×8.5 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 238 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor Win2 RT
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Win2 RT
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3104
- Refresh rate: 185 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Win2 RT
- 12070 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Win2 RT and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Win2 RT by 7.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Win2 RT
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor Win2 RT are nearly equal (99/100 vs 98/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Win2 RT is a bit better (97/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Win2 RT (96/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 78/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 31/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Win2 RT or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor Win2 RT — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Win2 RT and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Win2 RT has a MobileRank rating of 81/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Win2 RT or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Honor Win2 RT over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Win2 RT is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.