Honor Win Turbo2 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Win Turbo2 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 71/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win Turbo2 has the bigger battery (12070 mAh vs 7000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,366,913).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Win Turbo2
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor Win Turbo2 better?
- Bigger battery: 12070 vs 7000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
- Better display (97/100 vs 89/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2366913
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2072
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6649
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 230g vs 235g
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 81/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 45/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Win Turbo2 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 20 points higher (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Win Turbo2 (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Win Turbo2 is a bit better (97/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Win Turbo2 (96/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 78/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Win Turbo2 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2366913 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2072 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6649 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.9" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1440x3104 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 185 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 12070 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×78.0×8.5 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 235 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor Win Turbo2
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Win Turbo2
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3104
- Refresh rate: 185 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Win Turbo2
- 12070 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Win Turbo2 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Win Turbo2 by 44.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Win Turbo2
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Win Turbo2 (99/100 vs 81/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Win Turbo2 is a bit better (97/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Win Turbo2 (96/100 vs 45/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 78/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Win Turbo2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Win Turbo2 by 20 points (91/100 vs 71/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Win Turbo2 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Win Turbo2 has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Win Turbo2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 45/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Win Turbo2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the Honor Win Turbo2 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Win Turbo2 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.